This week I watched a video that explained how IEP's work and how they get put together in meetings. It was actually a really good video and something I've been interested in since high school. I appreciated the emphasis on the family's perspective, input, and inclusion. I was impressed by how many things were covered in the meeting and the details that were specified.
BUT, I am never happy with just one side.
How come we don't have IEPs for talented and gifted kids? If an IEP is "a promise to parents that we know your child and want to help them learn" does that mean we don't want to help the gifted children learn? There are no laws protecting the gifted children, so what can I do to help them? I think I need to get more training on talented and gifted children and programs so I can help my own class and other teachers. I just need to take things into my own hands.
As a group we studied and acted out a case for a young boy named Garrett. He is parlayed and needs a lot of help during the day, but his mental capacities are normal. This was interesting because we knew the outcome so we really just analyzed WHY they came to that conclusion. It took a while, but I think I agree with the conclusion. I agree that the school should take financial responsibility for Garrett's needs while he is at school. Going through this case made me realize that these are the types of things I may face as a teacher. I may be part of the decision making process and I need to get ready for that!
No comments:
Post a Comment